| LETTERS TO THE EDITOR: | ||
| Sad and Disheartening | ||
| Fire Code Is Clear | ||
| Identity Theft Risk | ||
| SEND A LETTER TO THE EDITOR | ||
| Sad and Disheartening | ||
| To the Editor: I think it is a sad and disheartening situation when a company of individuals such as the Moapa Valley Mortuary (MV Mortuary Hits Another Snag 3/18/2008), who have suffered such a traumatic loss are still suffering almost a year later. It is frustrating to know that this company has followed “the rules of the permit process” and are still being denied the ability to move on and improve their situation, when right outside my front door is an individual who has given no appropriate consideration to the permit process by living on and building structures, as well as a septic system that is not permitted. I can only hope that the Clark County Fire Inspector is allowed to take into consideration the proposed plans along with the letter from the water district and allow these people to move on with their valuable business to the community and personal life. Julie Nelsen |
||
| Fire Code Is Clear | ||
| To the Editor: It seems as though in the MV Mortuary Hits Another Snag, article in the 3/19/2008 issue of the Progress, they would like to give the public the impression that the new Senior Center has no fire hydrants; one of the many businesses that didn’t have to have the hydrants in before the building started, Open thy eyes – TWO hydrants, one on each corenr facing Moapa Valley Blvd. and guess what, before any building material has been brought on the property. Another point not mentioned is that the mortuary should have been required to have the hydrants installed before they brought the two trailers on the property so this problem is not new to them. The Jensen business had this problem andt they installed the hydrants and are doing business. The Telephone Company is coming before the Board of County Commissioners next month and they said they would do whatever the fire deparment required of them. The County Fire Code is very clear and it is not discriminatory. Read it. Billy D. Mildice |
||
| Identity Theft Risk | ||
| To the Editor: Should a local business protect its customers from potential identity theft? Why would a businessman change an employee from a maintenance position to accepting credit cards at the cash register after the employee was charged with identity theft. I, for one, feel this businessman has violated my trust, and will not be using my gas credit card at this location until this situation is corrected. I know that a person is presumed innocent until proven guilty. But the risk is too great to ignore. Lita Fisher |
||
| Tell Us What You Think | ||
| To send a letter to the editor by email, click here: EMAIL US Back |
||
